Відео

As in China, it is essential to protect producers from state predators (customs officials, police, politicians, etc.) by inviting them to go to "special economic zones".

Out of 200 countries in the world there are 100 countries with between 30,000,000 and 2,000,000 inhabitants. This is where Israel can contribute through its military know-how, internet , agricultural production, medical etc. ... An advice? outside the USA, do not waste 5 minutes with states having more than 30,000,000 residents.

I really like the slide that shows the supply/demand curves for gold and bitcoin

madness to have different countries. we all have the same needs.

תעשה סרטון על מכת ערוב ( שיש מלחמה בין הממשלות לבין חיות הבר בכל העולם)

תעשה סרטון על תאומים סיאמיים בן ובת ( תאומים סיאמיים גבר ואישה)

צריך שהמציאות תהיה כמו בסרטים, סדרות הטלוויזיה, משחקי המחשב ומשחקי הווידאו

אני בעד הסיינטולוגיה

אני בעד החוק האזרחי

אני בעד תחרות במשק

אני בעד הפרטה מדינית

אני בעד אנרכיזם ובעד ליברליזם

L-dub is a G.

יש מצב שעדיף גרעון מדיני מאשר גרעון ללא מדינה כלל

"It's the money supply!" You tell'em Hanke!

Michael McDaniel POLITICS - HOMO - PHILOSOPHY Politics definition, in its broadest sense, is all of the ways in which the human animal organizes its societal and group activities. We use systems based on the exercise of power over the individual and others to accomplish our purposes as a group. Everything we do or don’t do is the subject of our politics. In the course of our recorded history, we have used consensus, tribal chiefs, democracies, tribal counsels, kings, emperors, a feudal society of lords & surfs, city/state democracies, republican democracy, communism, fascism, tyrant-led “communism, and oligarchies. As civilized Homo sapiens, we have an extremely short ontology. We have only been passing and preserving what we have learned for future generations for about 15,000 years. At the time of my birth, we had entered a new knowledge age where it was no longer possible for one person to truly be a polymath. i.e. Someone who knew basically everything there was to be known. Now before the terminus of my life, we are adding to our store of knowledge at a rate commensurate with Moore’s Law and though this doubling every two years in transistor technology and the diminution of its cost is estimated to slow to a trickle in about twelve years, the speed and cost of our computer technology are truly mind-boggling. These limits of Moore’s Law only apply to the current transistor paradigm and do not figure in computing information based on new paradigms we have not considered. The calculus of change is so great we are at a loss to function well under our current governing methods. This increase in our technology has almost exceeded the individual Homo sapiens' ability to be a significant factor in the distant future. I say “distant” but it is a real problem already. The calculus of this change has resulted in information growth that can only be appreciated and thus used, by relatively few of our best minds. This has also put a great strain on our political institutions which were designed for a much less complicated age. Politically the only state of mind that lends itself to this new age is one accepting of and encouraging “change”. Which is often exactly that thought since the Enlightenment, characterized as “liberal”. However, the constraints of conservatism are probably of value in preventing us from stepping too far before proper preparation. I started referring to myself as a liberal more often as a consequence of the intentional changing of the word’s meaning by conservative operatives who wished to attack “thoughtfulness” which is a necessary adjunct of the liberal mind. We are now embroiled in a worldwide crisis arising from allowing our economic beliefs and attitudes to overly dominate our politics to the point where very few do, or certainly will in the future, control the vast majority. The way the majority lives or even “if” they survive are or will be, will be the result of the decisions of very few who have the power. If we continue with our current politics it will be those few who are wealthy. Not necessarily knowledgable or accomplished, but wealthy. Wouldn’t Adam Smith be proud? No, he would not! Even Adam Smith taught that capitalism and its markets required political controls and should not be left to their own devices. Today’s idea, that “markets” should be left alone and unregulated to produce their magic, is not supported by the claimed founder of the movement (Adam Smith). This movement is popular with large numbers because it is easy and requires much less intelligence and work by the so-called, experts and the people in general. Today under our political system a person can become wealthier in relatively few years than anyone ever did in the twentieth century. Is it because they are goal-driven and work hard? In part, but not that alone nor even primarily. No, it is because with a small amount of intelligent work and the expanded size and speed of markets their efforts and rewards are expanded exponentially by the society and systems developed before any of their personal efforts were made. Of course, you can see where our Calvinist attitudes have led us and why we cannot stay in our current position. We can’t stay here in stasis. Change is the one law of the Universe which we must acknowledge and is fully supported by all our verified facts. Our economic system of capitalism ameliorated by socialism is out of control. All our learning and our systems still require unchecked growth for economic success. There is no possibility of success without growth as long as interest is due to the providers of capital. We humans have been spending most of our mental effort on survival and our genome is full of information which has gotten us this far. Almost all of it has been developing skills that require us to subdivide reality into discrete parts. Our very method of determining intelligence is a measure of our ability to divide and subdivide us into them and us. I think if we are to be successful in this next stage of development we need to improve our powers of empathy and unity to which we will sacrifice much of our autonomy for the good of the whole. The age of individualism will give way to a new age of group loyalty and endeavours aimed at the improvement of life for our species which will necessarily involve us in the preservation of the world. We have much to learn from the examples of honeybees and ants. The trick may involve combining group coordinated efforts but preserving the individual inventiveness of our fellows. Economics is the tool we use to control and aim power in pursuit of our physical goals and as such is only concerned with a part of power. We are often confused and think our economics is our politics. We have been doing this intensely in the USA by equating capitalism with democracy. I think it is going to be quite a ride full of blood, and tears but it all must yield to love if we are to have long-term prospects of survival and surely a survival worth having. The new iteration of Homo which I call Homo technius will likely be the result of intentional action on our part to create a new man/woman based on intentional action for the first time in evolutionary history. Manipulating our genome, incorporating hardware into our bodies (now possible with nanotechnology) connection between individuals and the whole of humanity reminiscent of the ants & bees is where we are going. Whether democracy can long survive in its present form is questionable. What reliable ameliorating forces can we marshal against our crude creation of power? HELP?

Душно

José Piñera...embajador económico de nuestro país ..un lujo ..y es chileno

אני בעד שכר מינימום לפי הספק

אני בעד הסיינטולוגיה

צריך לקצץ במשטרה ולקצץ בפסיכיאטריה כדי לעשות כלכלה כמו של דנמרק ושבדיה

אני בעד תחרות במשק

אני בעד אנרכיזם ובעד ליברליזם

צריך לעשות הפגנות כדי שהממשלה תסבסד יותר לימודים של מדעים ומתמטיקה

צריך לעשות הפגנות כדי שיהיה רישום חינם על המצאות, פטנטים וזכויות יוצרים

משה פייגלין צריך להיות ראש הממשלה

צריך לבחור בעוצמה כלכלית ליברלית של גלעד אלפר

אני בעד תחרות במשק

אני בעד אנרכיזם ובעד ליברליזם

אני בעד הסיינטולוגיה

צריך לקצץ במשטרה ולקצץ בפסיכיאטריה כדי לעשות כלכלה כמו של דנמרק ושבדיה

Gilder is a national treasure. Absolute national treasure. His understanding of correct principles and the implication of correct principles is staggeringly important.

הכל נכון, אבל בנוחיות אופיינית מתעלמים מדבר אחד - הכל נכון לסוף מאה 19 על בסיס הכלכלי הקפיטליסטי לא ניתן עוד לבנות שום דבר חיובי. מהירות התפתחות טכנולוגית והעברת מידע למקום למקום כה מהירים עסקים קטנים הופכים לגדולים ב-0 זמן ומייד אוכלים את כל העסקים הקטנים בהשג ידם. כבר מעל 30 שנה הקפיטליזם במערב הוא אוליגרכי ומשם יש רק 2 כיוונים - מלחמה כוללת או סוציאליזם בינלאומי.

המון תאוריה, אבל זה כל כך לא שחור לבן בפועל. כל כך רחוק מכלכלה יישומית. כמעט כל מה שהוזכר לגבי מסים, יש לו גם צד התנהגותי המוביל לאפקט כלכלי הפוך מתאוריה יבשה.

Excellent presentation

אני בעד אנרכיזם ובעד ליברליזם

ישוע בא, תתכונן! "ראיתי מלאך אחר עף באמצע השמים, שיש לו את בשורת הנצח להטיף ליושבים על הארץ ולכל עם, ומלוה, ולשון ועם, אָמַר בְּקוֹל גָּדוֹל, יְרָא אֱלֹהִים וְתַתֵּן לוֹ, כִּי בָּאָה שַׁעַת מִשְׁפָּטוֹ; ותעבדו את שעושה את השמים ואת הארץ ואת הים ומעיינות המים." התגלות 14:6-7

אני בעד החוק האזרחי

אני בעד חופש חוזים מלא

אני בעד הסיינטולוגיה

צריך לקצץ במשטרה ולקצץ בפסיכיאטריה כדי לעשות כלכלה כמו של דנמרק ושבדיה

משה פייגלין צריך להיות ראש הממשלה

צריך לבחור בעוצמה כלכלית ליברלית של גלעד אלפר

משה פייגלין צריך להיות ראש הממשלה

צריך לעשות גם מקומות עבודה פרטיים וגם מקומות עבודה מולאמים שבמקומות העבודה הפרטיים מנהל יכול לפטר את מי שהוא רוצה ( וגם כדאי לבטל את הרגולציה ולבטל את הקביעות) וכל אלה שמפוטרים הולכים לעבוד במקומות העבודה המולאמים

Diana is very intelligent

None of these students have the slightest idea of what it means to run a business. I feel none of them have business experience. I think this is their major blind spot. Perhaps the education program should incorporate real world applications of starting and running a business, and have this part of the program as mandatory. Too much theory, can create incorrect assumptions which can lead to bad policy making. A lot of these questions from the students are emotional and sophist in nature. When someone is emotionally invested in an idea or problem like these students, it makes it that much harder for them to read between the lines, and understand other peoples points of view.

to materials is evident with prisions to delincuent.. , because the is. ! Is oscurent dream, in experiencians lotof speculations is very important with whetd the really to chileans. José Piñera whanted, is one mother fukk!, Thanks

❤️

George Gilder is a scammer, he is selling you use less reports. The money back guarantee is a scam too, because no body answer you, if you want your money back.